Reflection

Prayer, Anger and Forgiveness: What Changes When You Pray

I want to write about prayer, and I want to do it as a clinician, not a preacher. Because in twenty-five years of working with addiction, I have watched prayer do things in the consulting room that deserve a clinical description, whatever the reader believes about God.

The man who behaves like god

Start with the addict, because he shows the problem in its purest form. The addict behaves like god. I treat my body as a chemical laboratory: I decide what goes in, I decide what it will do, I decide what I will feel tonight. I behave as if natural law does not exist for me. What ruins everyone else will not ruin me; what is true of every human body is suspended in mine. This is not stupidity, it is grandiosity: the quiet conviction of being the exception.

Now look at what prayer is, structurally. It is the exact opposite posture. To pray is to accept that there is something bigger than me. It is an act of humility, and for the person who has been playing god, humility is not a moral decoration: it is the medicine. This is why the recovery movement discovered prayer clinically, long before it argued about theology. The first steps of recovery are precisely this movement: I am not in charge, something is bigger than me, and I stop pretending otherwise.

Praying from the bottom

People rarely find prayer in comfort. They find it when they are totally desperate, and something remarkable often happens there: it is the first time they truly find their voice. Not a rehearsed formula, but their own words, spoken toward something bigger than themselves, or toward the hope that there is something bigger. Notice that even the hope is enough. You do not need to have settled the question of who is listening.

And this is why prayer, whatever else it is, is an act of hope. The person who prays is saying: there is still something to do. He has moved, in the language of the recovery rooms, from the problem into the solution. I am not drowning in it tonight; I am praying about it. The posture alone is already different, and postures matter.

The resentment prayer

Here is the piece I find most useful in practice, and the most counterintuitive. When you are resentful, when you are angry at someone, the anger works like a fire, and thinking about the person feeds it. The more you turn them over in your mind, the more fuel you throw on. You can spend years stoking that fire and call it justice.

Now try the opposite: pray for the person. Wish them well. Think positively toward them, deliberately, even mechanically at first. Something happens that surprises everyone who tries it: the fire goes down. You cannot hold hatred and blessing in the same room; wishing someone well starves the very flame that thinking angrily about them feeds. There is an old discipline in the recovery rooms for exactly this: pray for that person, by name, every day for two weeks, and see what is left of the resentment. What burns down is not the other person. What burns down is your fire.

Prayer does not change the thing. It changes you.

Which brings me to the point underneath all of this. I do not think prayer is about changing the thing you pray about. The person who prays is the one who is changed. Kierkegaard said that prayer does not change God, but changes him who prays, and my consulting room agrees with him.

See what this quietly solves. If prayer worked by persuading a deity to intervene, it would be closed to the unbeliever. But if the mechanism is inward, then it works regardless of what is or is not listening. The desperate man is changed: humility where grandiosity was. The resentful man is changed: the fire starved instead of fed. Whether there is a god involved is a question I leave to each patient; that the one who prays is transformed is something I have watched too many times to doubt.

Forgiveness is not reconciliation

One question always comes, and it deserves a careful answer. What about the person who was genuinely harmed, abused, one way or another? Am I telling them to wish their abuser well?

Here a distinction matters more than almost any other I teach. Forgiveness is, if I may put it this way, a selfish act. I forgive in order to be at peace. It happens entirely inside me; it is the final act of putting down a fire I no longer want to carry. Reconciliation is something else: reconciliation is about the relationship. It takes two people, it requires safety, and it is often neither possible nor wise.

If you have been abused, then one way or another, one day, at your own pace and never on anyone else’s schedule, you will need to find peace with it; you will need to forgive, not for the abuser’s sake but for yours, because the alternative is carrying the fire forever. But you do not need to reconcile. You can forgive completely and never sit at that table again. Forgiveness is about your peace. Reconciliation is about the relationship. The first sets you free; the second is optional, and sometimes it must never happen.

I see patients in English and in French, at Harley Street in London, in Paris, and by secure video. See also the history of the twelve steps, addiction and psychotherapy, narcissistic abuse, the Karpman drama triangle, and the free book The Hold. Book a consultation.

Specialist help, in person in London or online worldwide, including addiction treatment in Switzerland.

In person: addiction counselling in London.