The Loneliness of the CEO

Reflection

The Loneliness of the CEO

Dr Philippe Jacquet 24 July 2026 4 min read

The situations described here are composited and altered. None corresponds to an identifiable person.

It is a cliché that it is lonely at the top. Like many clichés, it is profoundly true, and those who live it discover it from the inside, rarely in time.

I write in the masculine here: it is who I most often see, and where I write from. What follows extends well beyond that.

Alone at the top

When you lead, colleagues become, to some extent, reports. Friends become contacts. And even the closest bonds, a spouse, children, carry the weight of the responsibility without being able to share it. The circle of people you can speak to freely shrinks as the role grows. This is not a personal misfortune. It is the structure of the job.

The fears of the CEO

In my work with chief executives, the same fears return, almost always unspoken.

The fear of being found out, of not being equal to the chair. The fear of deciding: “Sometimes, at the moment of the call, I am paralysed by the thought that everything I have built could be destroyed by one mistake.”

The fear of exposure, too: a sentence lifted out of context, a name attached to a story, and a whole career is read backwards.

And a more intimate fear still, one that often governs the others: the fear of not being understood.

The P&L as the scale

A CEO lives under permanent evaluation, and in the end it is the P&L that says what he is worth. I know the mechanism from another side of my practice. For the anorexic or bulimic person, it is the scale that decides: an external number delivering an internal verdict.

What is striking, in both cases, is that the verdict never actually arrives. A good number does not reassure, it moves the bar. The relief lasts a quarter, sometimes an evening, and then the question returns untouched: am I worth anything? Because the question was never numerical, no number can answer it. That is why a man can succeed and feel nothing.

Fear in command

There is a leadership that understands itself as being in service of the team. And there is one that is defending itself. When a leader is afraid, of being found out, of getting it wrong, of losing what he built, it rarely comes out as an admission. It comes out as sharpness, as control, as meetings where nobody disagrees. It is not a character trait. It is a protection, and for a while it works.

The cost shows up later. A team learns not to cross you, which is not the same as following you. When people respect you, they go the extra mile. When they fear you, they do what is asked, and they let you find out the bad news too late. The protection ends up exposing you at exactly the point you were most afraid of.

Not a personal failure

Loneliness and fear at the top are not personal failings. They are the predictable outcome of a role where exposure is permanent, every word carries weight, and evaluation never stops.

The role hands you a mask, and the problem is not that you put it on. It is that after a while you no longer know how to take it off, or in front of whom.

Understanding this already changes something: the task is not to correct yourself, but to find somewhere to put what the role does not allow you to say.

A space to speak freely

What a chief executive needs is somewhere to speak without consequence. One man told me that before he began any work, when the pressure became too much and he did not know who to turn to, he would go somewhere anonymous, far outside his world. There, at least, he knew nothing would come back.

That need is real, and it deserves better than a confessional by default. Confession offers absolution and then silence: you walk out alone, carrying the same question. What that man was missing was not forgiveness. It was that someone would still be there the following week, and would remember.

That is what a confidential space offers: outside the organisation chart, held by someone with no stake in the company and the clinical depth to hear what is actually being said.


If you recognise yourself here, the executive coaching I offer holds both threads: the role and the man. You may also want to read male burnout and the desert of isolation, or arrange a confidential consultation.

Common questions

How does executive coaching differ from therapy?

The frame starts with the role and its decisions. But the role is held by a man, and what weighs on him rarely stays neatly professional. The work holds both threads rather than imposing an artificial line between them.

Is it genuinely confidential?

Yes. Nothing goes back to the company, the board, or shareholders. I hold no stake in your organisation and no relationship with its stakeholders.

How often, and for how long?

Usually a session every two weeks, remotely or in person, with no fixed end date. Some come for a few months around a decision; others stay longer.

Dr. Philippe Jacquet is an executive coach trained at ESSEC Business School and a Jungian analyst with over 25 years of clinical and coaching practice at Harley Street, London. He works with senior executives, CEOs and leadership teams in English and French, in person and by secure video. His coaching draws on both business school rigour and depth psychological practice, a combination built specifically for the problems that standard coaching cannot reach.